Change The Consititution?

[Dat Nizzle]

Something came up in an interview the other day. The good old Governor of
California Arnold was interviewed sometime in the last week and had said that he feels that any
residence of the U.S. who has been a residence for more than at least 20 years should have a
chance to become President of the US.

Right now, the Constitution states that to
qualify to run for President. You must be at least 35 years of age and a natural citizen of the
United States, in other words, you have to be born in this country.

I think the guy is an
idiot for even suggesting such a comment because that means he has ideas to run for the
white house. Now, I don't have a problem with the son or daughter of an immigrant becoming
President but I still think this law that you must be a natural born citizen of this nation should
apply for all eternity. Why give a reason for some rat bastard from some other nation come
here, live for 20 years and run for President, only to turn the shit down on us worst than Bush.
That's just my opinion of course.

[angle4eva]

Keep the Constitution the way it
is.

yea i agree too :grin: :grin:

[Lost Soul]

Keep the Constitution the
way it is.

yea i agree too :grin:
:grin:

than do something about it, motherfuckers need to stand
up, b/c if he could bush would abolish the whole thing

wait until something happens
and reagans "martial law" is rule, then u have NO rights

americans are stupid, have the
trust in the government the germans did before ww2, bet u didnt know only 4% of the german
population were nazi's? dont believe me? look it up
the germans know the deal, just like
the french, only the germans got no negative publicity compared to the french n thats because
that would raise serious arguments

[Dat Nizzle]

I have nothing
against the gays, they can live any way they want to live. I know my beliefs and I know what
they teach me about the lifestyle in general. The bible teaches it is a sin, none the less, it is
not for me to judge on their lifestyle.

On the other hand, after further discussing this
matter with others, it has been brought to my attention that would such an admendment
defining marriage really be necessary. Considering its a religious belief and by adding it as an
amendment, you run the risk of violating church and state separations. Can a religious belief
be an amendment on a governing piece of paper. Something to think about further.